Sustainability requires involvement at all levels, not just by a project team. This involvement has to be well defined if it is to become meaningful. |
Implementing sustainability is
necessarily about change. It starts with a change in mind-set in the very upper
reaches of management, where it is realised that from a strategic perspective,
sustainability makes business sense, is essential for organisational survival
and in fact is a strong source of competitive advantage. This realisation is
then translated into concrete action, in order for the organisation’s
sustainability goals to be realised. This includes a review of current
operations, where often there are many positive organisational attributes that
are already sustainable, but may not be recognised as such. Then of course
there are those factors which are not sustainable and need to changed or phased
out. Finally, there is the very structure of the organisation, which needs to
be modified such that it has the capacity to adapt on an ongoing basis, on the
understanding that becoming sustainable is not a project, but a process.
This process will involve changes
in technology, changes in relationships with suppliers, customers, regulators
and other stakeholders, revision of work practices, the development of new
products and markets and fundamentally new ways of doing business. It cannot be
about a few piecemeal projects that while positive in their own right, are not
part of a broader transformation. It
will also be difficult to make sustainability “stick” if it is one of many
other “initiatives” in the organisation. Instead, it should be integrated into
everything the organisation does, sending a consistent message to all employees
and stakeholders that this is the path that has now been chosen.
Warm and fuzzy messages do not in
themselves bring about change. Yes, it is of course important for all employees
within an organisation to understand why change is necessary, and the broader
impacts of that change. It is however vital to understand exactly how different
levels of the organisation will have an impact on sustainability performance,
and then to build sustainable practices into job roles at all levels. Without
this level of detail, it is difficult to make sustainability something “real”.
It is a good idea to engage employees on this
issue, making them a part of the process of uncovering sustainable work
practices. It is however the work of management to analyse each level of the
organisation in detail, to assess precisely how every job impacts on
sustainability, and then to build the infrastructure around each job to support
sustainable work practices. This gives employees a point of departure, a
foundation upon which to build new job roles that they can make their own. Of
course, I’m referring hear to organisations that are participative in nature,
which I think you have to be if you want to become more sustainable.
To give you an idea about the
types of tasks and behaviours I’m talking about, below is an overview of how an
issue like energy efficiency touches on the job roles of different groups of
employees on an industrial site.
STAFF
|
ROLE IN ENERGY EFFICIENCY
|
MECHANISMS FOR EFFECTING CHANGE
|
Executive management
|
Highlight energy efficiency as a strategic issue
|
Communication channels such as newsletters and site forums
|
Set short, medium and long-term site-wide targets
|
Build into performance goals for managers and departments
|
|
Provide resources for attainment of targets
|
Budgeting processes
|
|
Foster integration of sustainability
|
Include in all areas of operations at the strategic level
|
|
Middle Management and technical staff
|
Identify energy efficiency opportunities
|
Technical audits and facilitation of shop floor focus groups
|
Improve work practices to enhance energy efficiency
|
Review of work instructions and procedures
Training of staff on the energy efficiency issues within their
control
|
|
Optimise efficiency of existing operations
|
Plant settings that minimise energy use e.g. lower operating
temperatures and pressures
Preventive maintenance programme development and implementation to
eliminate failures
|
|
Modify equipment and source new technologies
|
Investigations into the efficiency of current equipment
Research into technological alternatives
Identification of alternative suppliers
Justification of modifications and capital investments
|
|
Shop Floor staff
|
Operate equipment more sustainably
|
Addressing failures that may not affect throughput,
but waste energy e.g. compressed air leaks
Switching off of lighting and equipment when not needed
Following agreed best operating practice rigorously
|
Minimise defects and rework
|
Prompt action for quality problems that may lead to rework and wasted
energy
|
|
·
Etc…
|
The table is by no means
comprehensive, and there are many other staff functions that are not shown here
who all have a role to play. What the above is meant to show is that if you
limit the scope of sustainability within an organisation to a few people and
treat it as a project, opportunities are lost. There is a role for all
employees to play, and it is up to managers to identify what that role is, and
then to engage with employees to develop the role further. In doing so, use
must be made of existing management infrastructure, and where there are already
positive sustainability practices in play, these should be enhanced and
reinforced.
This is not a “top-down” process.
Senior management need to lead, this is true, but there should be mechanisms in
place for continuous feedback from the strategic to the operational levels and
back again. The entire organisation should be engaged in a conversation about
sustainability, and prepared to modify plans and actions at all levels in
response to results achieved.
Copyright © 2013, Craig van Wyk,
all rights reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment