Electricity is
an indispensable energy carrier in industrial plants, where it is used to power
induction motors, provides energy for the heating of materials, in lighting
applications, for activities such as welding and soldering, in induction
furnaces and for many other uses. Individual industries tend to have quite
different electrical energy demands, but it is safe to say that as electricity
prices continue to escalate, most management teams have electricity savings firmly in their sights.
Why concern your organisation with energy efficiency?
Reducing
electrical energy consumption is of interest to sustainability-focused
organisations for the following reasons:
In energy-intensive industries
electrical energy efficiency is a powerful profit driver. This is becoming even
more of an issue in countries such as South Africa, where electricity prices for
industrial organisations have been escalating at in excess of 25%/annum for a few years in
succession now;
Every unit of electrical energy
saved translates into a reduced impact on the environment. In South Africa,
each kWh of energy produced is estimated to generate 1.015 kg of carbon dioxide
equivalents1 due to the coal-heavy nature of our energy mix. Then
there are of course the large amounts of water required to generate power from
coal, along with particulate emissions, mercury emissions and potential quality impacts on
water resources. Further up the value chain, there are
significant impacts arising from coal mining. From a life-cycle perspective,
there are therefore few more meaningful things an organisation can do for the
environment than to reduce electrical energy consumption.
The above issues have social impacts, since increased profits can contribute towards job creation, both directly within a business and within its broader value chain, and environmental degradation generally tends to hurt socially vulnerable communities more. In emerging economies (and in first world countries too at times), power supplies can also be limited and energy efficiency therefore helps to make limited resources available to more consumers.
How should individual industrial power consumers begin an energy efficiency programme, and what are the important issues to consider when doing so? The nature of
your industry will dictate where you will need to focus, but where should you start, and how are the savings actually going to be realised? I will
hopefully answer some of these questions in this article.
Baseline your performance
The first thing
you need to do is to analyse and understand your electricity bills and each
cost element contained in them. When analysing an industrial site’s energy
profile, I typically look at monthly bills stretching back over the most recent
two year period. This gives me a sense of any seasonality in electricity
consumption, the timing and scale of past price increases, and the tariff
structure employed. Linking energy consumption to production levels is useful
in terms of understanding crude energy intensity levels e.g. kWh/ton of
production, and I typically construct trends of the data in order to provide
insight into patterns. This exercise alone can immediately suggest savings
opportunities. For example, there may be opportunities to shift load and
achieve a lower average cost of electricity where time-of-use and maximum
demand charges are applied.
Assess the performance of individual processes and energy users
Conducting an
energy audit of your operations at the process level should be your next
activity in the quest to become more energy-efficient. There are typically a
number of specialist companies you could approach to conduct such an audit. The
audit should look at individual aspects of your operation and every point at
which electricity is being used, but should also incorporate a “systems view”
which takes potential impacts and synergies between individual areas into
account. Hence, if you are reducing the energy requirements of a furnace, for
example, it is not only about making the furnace more efficient, but also about
reducing the levels of rework which that furnace needs to process. Solving a
problem of that nature may require a review of downstream operations in
relation to the furnace, and cannot be solved by looking at the energy
efficiency of those operations and the furnace as separate entities.
An electrical
energy efficiency audit will highlight areas of opportunity, and for each of
these, the next step is to identify appropriate solutions. These solutions need
not require large investment, and could include changes to shop floor work
practices, the implementation of improved management systems, the performance
of appropriate preventive maintenance tasks, changes to process set points and
other approaches. The table below outlines a few examples of these types of
solutions.
ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROBLEMS THAT DO NOT REQUIRE INVESTMENT
FOR THEIR SOLUTION
ENERGY EFFICIENCY OPPORTUNITY
|
SOLUTION
|
Electrically heated process
baths are operated at too high a temperature.
|
Reduce temperature set point by
5 deg. C
|
Refrigeration plant evaporative
condenser is not removing enough heat from the refrigerant. Tubes were found
to be excessively scaled up and some nozzles were blocked.
|
Institute a chemical de-scaling
programme for the condenser tubes and a blowdown procedure for the cooling
water.
|
Too many factory lights were
found to be left on unnecessarily at night.
|
Add more switches to allow areas to be individually controlled, and institute a checklist for plant operators
for implementation when the plant is shut down at night.
|
Compressed air reticulation
system was found to have excessive air leaks.
|
Institute a regular leak
detection and maintenance programme.
|
Compressed air pressure too
high.
|
Reduce compressor pressure set
point.
|
V-belts on drive systems
slipping excessively.
|
Measure belt tension and correct
regularly, taking care to check alignment at the same time.
|
Air conditioners set at too low
a temperature during the warm months.
|
Increase the air conditioner
temperature set points.
|
Production systems running on
idle for long periods due to poor planning.
|
Investigate bottlenecks in
material flow and improve planning processes.
|
Technological
solutions are widely available to improve energy efficiency, and it is worthwhile
to keep up to date with latest developments through regular engagements with
OEM’s, and attending industry engagements (seminars/conferences). There is also
a wealth of information available on the internet, but take care to verify
manufacturers’ claims.
Understand the risks associated with individual solutions
Whether
solutions are technological or not, remember to assess the risks involved with
the implementation of any solution. Reducing the temperature of a process bath
in an electroplating operation could have implications for drag out losses, for
example, and dropping air pressure on a site could affect the operation of
individual machines. While not all such risks can be quantified beforehand,
make a point of evaluating the impacts of changes made so that if there are
unintended consequences, these can be rapidly detected and dealt with. Where
there are significant capital costs involved in your solution, consider life
cycle costs, not just capital outlay. While operating costs tend to dominate
life cycle costs for electrical equipment such as lighting, consider also
environmental impacts, and the challenges that could be associated with the
safe disposal of used components.
A useful risk
management strategy is to pursue limited implementation, which allows an
assessment of post-implementation performance prior to making larger financial
commitments. This is particularly important when working with novel
technologies, but of course cannot be used to assess risks which only present
themselves after a long period of time, since implementation would be unduly delayed.
Another option would be to insist on client references, and to contact these
clients to get their views on the merits of individual energy efficiency
products.
Evaluate implemented options and use feedback constructively
Finally, each
implemented sub-project should be reviewed against the criteria which justified
its implementation in the first place. This aspect of implementation, which you
could call “performance testing”, is in my experience the most neglected part
of energy efficiency project implementation. Are those new lighting
arrangements really using the amount of energy expected, and is the light
provided sufficient and sustained? If not, what is the problem? As with all
continuous improvement, improvements in energy efficiency are also subject to
the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle.
I will review
individual energy efficiency opportunities and how to practically assess these
in future posts.
References
1. Letete, Guma
and Marquard, “Information on climate change in South Africa: greenhouse gas
emissions and mitigation options”, University of Cape Town Energy Research
Centre.
This is bigger than i thought. Thank you anyway for the share.
ReplyDelete@Razell you know what they say about eating an elephant :).
ReplyDelete